TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENCABUTAN KETERANGAN BERITA ACARA PEMERIKSAAN (BAP) OLEH TERDAKWA DI PERSIDANGAN DENGAN ALASAN DALAM PEMERIKSAAN DI DEPAN PENYIDIK TIDAK DIDAMPINGI PENASIHAT HUKUM DAN KEKUATANNYA SEBAGAI BAHAN PEMERIKSAAN DALAM PERSIDANGAN PERKARA PENGHASUTAN (STUDI KASUS DALAM PUTUSAN NO. 2336/Pid.B/2008/JKT.PST)

CANDRA S, P. JEFRI LEO (2011) TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENCABUTAN KETERANGAN BERITA ACARA PEMERIKSAAN (BAP) OLEH TERDAKWA DI PERSIDANGAN DENGAN ALASAN DALAM PEMERIKSAAN DI DEPAN PENYIDIK TIDAK DIDAMPINGI PENASIHAT HUKUM DAN KEKUATANNYA SEBAGAI BAHAN PEMERIKSAAN DALAM PERSIDANGAN PERKARA PENGHASUTAN (STUDI KASUS DALAM PUTUSAN NO. 2336/Pid.B/2008/JKT.PST). Other thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

[img] PDF - Published Version
Download (1241Kb)

    Abstract

    P. Jefri Leo Candra S, E0007176. 2011. JURIDICAL OVERVIEW REVOCATION INTERROGATION (BAP) IN COURT BY DEFENDANT WITH REASON IN INTERROGATION IN FRONT OF INVESTIGATORS ARE NOT ACCOMPANIED BY LEGAL ATTORNEY AND STRENGTH AS MATERIAL EXAMINATION IN THE TRIAL OF INCITEMENT CASE (CASE STUDY IN DECISION NO.2336/Pid.B/JKT.PST). Faculty of Law Sebelas Maret University. The purpose of this writing is to know interrogation without legal attorney may be the reason by defendant to revoke the statement interrogation (BAP) in the trial and strength interrogation (BAP) is repelead by the defendant as the material examination in the trial of incitement case on decision NO.2336/Pid.B/JKT.PST. This law essay including kind of normative law research that give a prescriptive about revocation of defendant's testimony with reason in interrogation in front of investigators are not accompanied by legal attorney and strength as material examination in the trial of incitement case (case study in decision NO.2336/PID.B/JKT.PST). Technique collecting of material law is doing by library research to collect and arrange material law that relate with the problem which researched, and the way is by inventarization and learning The Rules, Books, Essays and documents that relate with the problem that researched by the writer. In addition syllogism method with a pattern of thinking of deduction. The result that can be got from this research is revocation of defendant’s testimony in a case decision No: 2336 / Pid.B / 2008 / JKT.PST rejected or not accepted by the Panel of Judges for the revocation by defendant testimony made by FERRY JOKO JULIANTONO, SE, Ak.Msi is unfounded and illogical. Basic and logical means that the reason underlying the revocation must be able to be verified reinforced or supported by other evidence showing that the reason for revocation are true and veriable by the judges. Strength of Interrogation (BAP) as a material examination, if the revocation is received so Interrogation (BAP) can considered not correct and information that are reasoning by the Panel of Judges is expressed by the defendant's testimony at trial. Whereas if the repeal is rejected by the judge, then the description of the accused (suspect) in interigation (BAP) can be used as aningredient in the trial examination. Key word: Revocation of Defendant’s Testimony, Interrogation (BAP)

    Item Type: Thesis (Other)
    Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
    Divisions: Fakultas Hukum
    Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum
    Depositing User: AB Kusuma
    Date Deposited: 22 Jul 2013 17:42
    Last Modified: 22 Jul 2013 17:42
    URI: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/id/eprint/7636

    Actions (login required)

    View Item