PERBANDINGAN DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI MINIPILE DAN SUMURAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE MEYERHOF, LCPC, DAN AOKI DE ALENCER

Sugesti, Titin Ferryana (2017) PERBANDINGAN DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI MINIPILE DAN SUMURAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE MEYERHOF, LCPC, DAN AOKI DE ALENCER. Other thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

[img] PDF - Published Version
Download (120Kb)

    Abstract

    Titin Ferryana Sugesti, Niken Silmi Surjandari and Noegroho Djarwanti, 2017. Comparison Of Power Support Minipile And Sumuran Foundation Method Using Meyerhof, LCPC, And Aoki And De Alencer. Thesis. Departement of Civil Engineering. Engineering Faculty. Sebelas Maret University. Surakarta. Investigations in the field to determine the capacity of the support pole is very diverse and each formula has multiple methods of inquiry in determining the capacity of the pole. This depends on the parameters obtained by these tests, if these tests are carried out before the construction and implementation of the data which he obtained is characteristic of the ground then this test called static formula, while the testing is done at the time of construction and implementation of data obtained by testing the form parameter erection then this testing full-scale load tests are classified. The purpose of this research is (1) to compare the application with the LCPC Method Meyerhof Methods when used on the type of Foundation minipile, (2) compare the application method Method with Aoki and Meyerhof De Alencar when used on the type of Foundation sumuran, (3) compare the application method when used on a type of Meyerhof Foundation minipile and sumuran. The data used for this study is secondary data in the form of the data of CPT as much as 15 data points derived from some project in the region of Surakarta. The type of Foundation that is used is the Foundation of minipile and sumuran and the type of soil in the field assumed clays. Pole specification used the diameter of Foundation minipile & sumuran: Ø25 cm, Ø30 cm and Ø35 cm. Based on the results of the analysis of the power capacity of the Ground support by using several methods, namely Meyerhof, LCPC, and Aoki and De Alencar on the Foundation of the minipile and sumuran obtained: (1) a comparison between the Method and the method of LCPC Meyerhof, having a depth of 4 meters there is the difference in behavior, the method of LCPC Ø25 cm = 125.07 tons, Ø30 cm = 144.25 tons, Ø35 cm = 168.28 tons, while that of Meyerhof Ø25 cm = 96.21 tons, Ø30 cm =131.95 tons, Ø35 cm = 173.18 tonnes. (2) a comparison of the munjukkan that the results of Qu (resource support) at a depth of 5 meters of the method and the method of Aoki and Meyerhof De Alencar shows a significant difference, namely the method of Aoki and De Alencar Ø25 cm = 638.60 tons, Ø30 cm = 777.05 tons, Ø35 cm = 914.10 tonnes. While the Meyerhof Ø25 cm = 256.73 tons, Ø30 cm = 308.64 tons, Ø35 cm = 363.34 tonnes. This happens because many use the empirical factor i.e. Fb, Fs, qc (base), qc (side). (3) the comparison between the Foundation of the minipile and sumuran method using Meyerhof, having a depth of 4 meters, there is a difference in behavior between minipile and sumuran Foundation, namely the Foundation sumuran Ø25 cm = 161.01 tons, Ø30 cm = 191.71 tons, Ø35 cm = 229.95 tons. While minipile Ø25 cm = 96.21 tons, Ø30 cm = 131.95 tons, Ø35 cm = 173.18 tons. Keywords : power support, methods of Meyerhof, LCPC, Aoki and De Alencar.

    Item Type: Thesis (Other)
    Subjects: T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
    Divisions: Fakultas Teknik > Teknik Sipil
    Depositing User: Reni reni
    Date Deposited: 31 Dec 2017 16:53
    Last Modified: 31 Dec 2017 16:53
    URI: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/id/eprint/38685

    Actions (login required)

    View Item