ARGUMENTASI PENUNTUT UMUM MENGAJUKAN KASASI ATAS DASAR JUDEX FACTI KELIRU MENAFSIRKAN TINDAKAN MELAWAN HUKUM SEBAGAI WANPRESTASI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1691 K/PID/2015)

RISKI A P, CUT (2017) ARGUMENTASI PENUNTUT UMUM MENGAJUKAN KASASI ATAS DASAR JUDEX FACTI KELIRU MENAFSIRKAN TINDAKAN MELAWAN HUKUM SEBAGAI WANPRESTASI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1691 K/PID/2015). Other thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

[img] PDF - Published Version
Download (844Kb)

    Abstract

    ABSTRACT Cut Riski Anugrah Putri. E0013103. PROSECUTOR GENERAL APPEALED ARGUMENTS BASED ON FALSE JUDEX FACTI INTERPRETING ACTION AGAINST THE LAW AS A TORT IN CRIME OF FRAUD (Study Of The Supreme Court Decision Number 1691 K/PID/2015). Faculty of Law Sebelas Maret University. This study aims to determine the arguments of Public Prosecutor submit cassation on the basis of Judex Facti misinterpreted as a tort action against the law and the consideration of Supreme Court granted the submission of Cassation Prosecutor General declared the defendant guilty of fraud. The method used is a normative legal research. With the approach of the case and how the collection of legal materials with literature. Sources of legal materials used were the primary law and secondary law, with legal materials analysis techniques using syllogisms and interpretation by using a pattern of deductive reasoning. Berdarsarkan research conducted authors note that the petition Cassation Public Prosecutor on the basis of Judex Facti District Court Samarinda have made a mistake by not applying the rule of law as appropriate in accordance with the provisions of Article 253 paragraph (1) letter a Indonesia Criminal Procedure Code as well as the consideration of the Supreme Court granted the petition of Cassation Public Prosecutor , cancel Samarinda District Court Number 913/Pid.B/2014/PN.Smr and prosecute the case itself which essentially states the defendant has been proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing the crime of fraud and convict the defendant therefore be punished prison for three (3) years and six (6) months. Keywords: Cassation, Judge Considerations, Criminal Fraud

    Item Type: Thesis (Other)
    Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
    Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum
    Depositing User: Mujahidah Showafah
    Date Deposited: 08 Apr 2017 16:08
    Last Modified: 08 Apr 2017 16:08
    URI: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/id/eprint/33398

    Actions (login required)

    View Item