Permohonan Kasasi Penuntut Umum Terhadap Putusan Bebas Judex Factie tanpa Mempertimbangkan Fakta Persidangan Sebagai Alat Bukti Petunjuk dalam Perkara Narkotika (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 1359K/Pid,Sus/2013)

K, NURINA CHAERANI (2017) Permohonan Kasasi Penuntut Umum Terhadap Putusan Bebas Judex Factie tanpa Mempertimbangkan Fakta Persidangan Sebagai Alat Bukti Petunjuk dalam Perkara Narkotika (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 1359K/Pid,Sus/2013). Other thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

PDF - Published Version Download (1346Kb)

Abstract

This report aims to review of an appeal to reason by prosecutors against kuhap and consideration Judex Juris in an appeal to answer in matters of narcotics. The kind of research writer use in preparing research this law is research normative law is perspective. Approach that used is case approach. A source of a law used is the primary law and secondary law. Legal materials analysis techniques used by the author is to use legal reasoning by syllogism deduction method. Based on the results of research and discussion an appeal to conclude that proposal by prosecutors with reason judex factie do not judge properly having no regard to the trial for evidence guidance has qualified materially as stipulated in section of 253 paragraph (1) letter a Criminal Procedure Code. In this case Judex Factie not apply properly to ignore the facts at the trial. Related to the legal arguments in the Supreme court judge granted the public prosecutor’s appeal on the grounds Judex Factie not apply the law in the case of Narcotics is in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 256 jo Article 193 paragraph (1). Keywords: Prosecutors, Judex Factie, Narcotics

Actions (login required)