PROFIL KONSEPSI SISWA KELAS XI IPA 1 SEMESTER 1 SEKOLAH MENENGAH ATAS TENTANG PELUANG (Studi Kasus pada SMA Batik 2 Surakarta Tahun Ajaran 2009/2010)

QODIYAWATI, NURUL (2010) PROFIL KONSEPSI SISWA KELAS XI IPA 1 SEMESTER 1 SEKOLAH MENENGAH ATAS TENTANG PELUANG (Studi Kasus pada SMA Batik 2 Surakarta Tahun Ajaran 2009/2010). Other thesis, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan.

[img] PDF - Published Version
Download (2170Kb)

    Abstract

    The aims of this research are: (1) to describe of student‟s conception degree about probability. (2) to know the causes of student‟s unknown of concept and misconception about probability. This research used the qualitative method. Research‟s subject are students of XI IPA 1 2009/2010 academic year. There are 6 students that determined through purposive sampling. Then, those 6 students would be interviewed because of their reliability to the research subject condition. There are have a high first ability, middle first ability, and low first ability, and they could easily to take information when interview consist. It‟s based on consideration from mathematic teacher of XI IPA 1. The technique of collecting data is done with documentation, test, and interview method. Instrument test that used essay test contains 4 items. Validation data is done with a contemporary friends checkup by discussion, it‟s mean to expose the temporary result or final result of research in discussion with contemporary friends. The aim of this method are to make the researcher still defend the open and honest attitude, it‟s also given a good beginning opportunity to began checkup and examine the work of hypothesis which appear from researcher thoughts. Data analysis is done by reducing data, data presentation, and taking summary. Based on research can be concluded that:(1) student‟s conception degree in topic main of probability: (a) about space of sample: (i) student with high and low first ability to be on fourth degree, understanding partly and founded misconception. (ii) student with middle first ability to be on misconception category. Probably exists a misconception on the subject when he said that the pair of dice (a,b) has the same meaning with a pair of dice (b,a). (b) about probability of event: (i) student with high first ability to be on fourth degree, understanding partly and founded misconception. (ii) student with middle first ability to be on third degree, founded misconception. (iii) student with low first ability to be on misconception category. Probably exists a misconception on the subject when students often interpret events that happen in everyday life have greater opportunities (c) about limitation of probability: all first ability to be on fourth degree, understanding partly and founded misconception. Probably exists a misconception on the subject when students mentioned that the maximum limit or the largest of the values is there any chance of an infinitely (d) about two complex events A and B: all first ability to be on third degree, founded misconception. Probably exists a misconception on the subject when students interpret an event that is free as an incident that occurred on the motion tool free play. (e) about two complex events A or B: (i) student with high first ability to be on sixth degree, understanding. (ii) student with middle and low first ability to be on third degree, founded misconception. Probably exists a misconception on the subject when students interpret an event which they depend disjoint factors that influence the spinning tool, (2) causes of unknown of concept and misconception about probability: (a) about space of sample: student do not have enough practice to answer a question for example and not example case, simplification of meaning about point of sample, misunderstanding the meaning sense of question. (b) about probability of event and limitation of probability: student wrong in given definition about probability of event, student preconception about point of sample still wrong, student just rely don‟t know and just depend on remembering ability without understand concept, the using tool of models is not exactly represent enough to describe of concept, ability of student on remember is not good and forget on formula, student intuition is wrong. (c) about two complex events: student wrong in given definition about two complex event, comprehension about some concept are mingled and cannot diferentiate between concept with another ones, the way of studying on understanding concept still wrong, the using tool of models is not exactly represent enough to describe of concept, student just rely don‟t know and just depend on remembering ability without understand concept, student didn‟t understand about concept of released and unreleased compilation.

    Item Type: Thesis (Other)
    Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
    Divisions: Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
    Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > Pendidikan Matematika
    Depositing User: Lutvi Satriyo Putro
    Date Deposited: 13 Jul 2013 18:31
    Last Modified: 13 Jul 2013 18:31
    URI: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/id/eprint/3198

    Actions (login required)

    View Item