PERBEDAAN PENDAPAT PENILAIAN ALASAN PERMOHONAN KASASI PENUNTUT UMUM BERDASARKAN KESALAH PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENENTUAN TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA TERHADAP TERDAKWA ( Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 161 K/ Pid.Sus/2014 )

Tirano, Redy Giles (2016) PERBEDAAN PENDAPAT PENILAIAN ALASAN PERMOHONAN KASASI PENUNTUT UMUM BERDASARKAN KESALAH PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENENTUAN TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA TERHADAP TERDAKWA ( Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 161 K/ Pid.Sus/2014 ). Other thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (198Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    The aim of this research describe of problem, firstly is abaout the reasons of cassation prosecutors bassed on mistake considerations judge accordance with clause 253 Code Of Criminal Procedure, second is about dissent of opinion Judge based on reason of Kasasi Prosecutors accordamce with code of Criminal Procedure. The research is normative legal, with perspective in nature with case approach techniques is literature study and deduction logis with qualitative analysis The result of research showed that reasons of cassation Prescutors is appropresate of clause 253 Criminal Procedure code and then the dissent of opinion appropriate with the Criminal Procedur Code, especially with clause 182 verse 6 Criminal Procedure Code, also othe regulation Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman clause 14 and Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2009 tentang Mahkamah Agung clause 30. Key words :Dissent of Opinion,Cassation and Narcotic Crime

    Item Type: Thesis (Other)
    Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
    Divisions: Fakultas Hukum
    Depositing User: Afifah Nur Laili
    Date Deposited: 31 May 2016 05:06
    Last Modified: 31 May 2016 05:06
    URI: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/id/eprint/26667

    Actions (login required)

    View Item