TINJAUAN PEMBATALAN DEMI HUKUM SURAT DAKWAAN OLEH HAKIM DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP KEWENANGAN PENUNTUTAN PENUNTUT UMUM TERHADAP PERKARA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK ( Studi Putusan Sela Pengadilan Negeri Mataram Nomor: 276/Pid.B/2013/Pn.Mtr)

RAHMADITA, LINTANG JENDRO (2016) TINJAUAN PEMBATALAN DEMI HUKUM SURAT DAKWAAN OLEH HAKIM DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP KEWENANGAN PENUNTUTAN PENUNTUT UMUM TERHADAP PERKARA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK ( Studi Putusan Sela Pengadilan Negeri Mataram Nomor: 276/Pid.B/2013/Pn.Mtr). Other thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (205Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    ABSTRACT Lintang Jendro Rahmadita, E0012233. OVERVIEW OF CANCELLATION BY LAW THE INDICTMENT BY THE JUDGE AND IMPLICATIONS AGAINST THE AUTHORITY PROSECUTION OF PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AGAINST IN DEFAMATORY CASE AT MATARAM DISTRICT COURT WITHIN INTERVAL VERDICT NUMBER 276/PID.B/2013/PN.MTR. Faculty of Law Sebelas Maret University. Research aims to determine cancellation by law the indictment by the judge and the prosecution authority implications public prosecutor against the defamation case Mataram District Court within Interval Verdict Number: 276/Pid.B/2013/PN.Mtr. Method used prescriptive normative research and applied research. Sources of law materials used the primary law and secondary law. Data collection techniques used literature study. Law material analysis techniques use the method of deductive syllogism with patterns of thinking. Based on the results of research conducted by the authors concluded that indictment are the basis or framework of the examination of the defendant in a trial, the manufacture of indictment by public prosecutor has many shortcomings because it does not in accordance with Article 143 Paragraph (2) b within Criminal Procedure Code, which result in law null and void the indictment. Implications of public prosecutor prosecution in this case are which interval verdict the verdict that have not touched on the case subject. The judge accepted the exception of the defendant or law advisor, in accordance with the relative competencies associated with authority tribunal to prosecute all criminal case committed in the jurisdiction, in this case the defendant LALU KAHARUDIN, S. Sos, IWAN PAHLAWAN BALUKEA, YOSEP ANDREAS RUKU MAN, and ANDIK BUDI HARIONO domiciled in Mataram, then standing of verdict are at court first instance, in this case Mataram district court. Keywords: The Indictment, Cancellation By Law, Defamation.

    Item Type: Thesis (Other)
    Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
    Divisions: Fakultas Hukum
    Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum
    Depositing User: Afifah Nur Laili
    Date Deposited: 30 May 2016 07:46
    Last Modified: 30 May 2016 07:46
    URI: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/id/eprint/26587

    Actions (login required)

    View Item