PENGARUH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 21/PUUXII/2014 TERHADAP PUTUSAN NOMOR 2/PID.PRAP/2015/PN.KFM MENGENAI PENETAPAN STATUS ONGKY SYAHRUL RAMADHONA SEBAGAI TERSANGKA KORUPSI

Yuristia , Rishma (2016) PENGARUH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 21/PUUXII/2014 TERHADAP PUTUSAN NOMOR 2/PID.PRAP/2015/PN.KFM MENGENAI PENETAPAN STATUS ONGKY SYAHRUL RAMADHONA SEBAGAI TERSANGKA KORUPSI. Other thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (670Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    ABSTRACT Rishma Yuristia, E0011265, 2016, INFLUENCE OF RULLIN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT VERDICT NUMBER. 21/PUU-XII/2014 TO VERDICT NUMBER 2/PID.PRAP/2015/PN.KFM REGARDING SUSPECT STATUS OF ONGKY SYAHRUL RAMADHONA AS SUSPECT FOR CRIME OF CORRUPTION. Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret. This reseach aim to know the influence of rullin Constitutional Court verdict Number:21/PUU-XII/2014 regarding pretrial filing against the determination of the status of Ongky Syahrul Ramadhona as a suspect the perpetrators of the crime of corruption and considerations of Kefamenanu District Court’s Judge in checking out and deciding of filling pretrial status assigment related Ongky Syarul Ramadhona as suspect were in accordance with Code of Criminal Procedure. This reseach is normative legal reseach which both prescriptive and applied by case approach method. Analyzing of primary and secondary legal materials in the form of legislation, jurisdence, books of relevant law and other related resources. Legal materials collection technique in the writing of this law is literature study (studilybrary). Analysis techniques of materials by the method of deduction law of syllogism, pose mayor premise amd minor premise and drawn the conclusion. The result of this study are among other the influence of rulling Constitutional Court Nomor:21/PUU-XII/2014 expanding scope of pretrial Investigation, First, the investigation is no longer only to find the suspect, but after the investigation was complete on the basis of at least two items of evidence valid as stipulated in Article 184 paragraph (1) the new Criminal Procedure Code can be determined who the suspects. Reasoning of pretrial submission is determination of the suspect was not valid because without ever summoned and questioned formally and not fulfilled their two items of legitimate evidence. Secondly, the investigation was not conducted in accordance with Article 1 paragraph 2 Code of Criminal Procedure and Article 184 paragraph (1) so that the determination of the status Ongky Syahrul Ramadhona a corruption suspect unauthorized. On the basis that in its decision: Granting Petition Pretrial entirety. Keywords: Verdict of Constitutional Court, Pretrial, Suspect Corruption

    Item Type: Thesis (Other)
    Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
    Divisions: Fakultas Hukum
    Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum
    Depositing User: Afifah Nur Laili
    Date Deposited: 30 May 2016 07:45
    Last Modified: 30 May 2016 07:45
    URI: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/id/eprint/26586

    Actions (login required)

    View Item