PERBEDAAN PENERAPAN ASAS TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU DALAM PERKARA PERCERAIAN DENGAN ALASAN PERTENGKARAN TERUS MENERUS DI PENGADILAN AGAMA DAN PENGADILAN NEGERI

Aldilla , Fiqi Amalia (2016) PERBEDAAN PENERAPAN ASAS TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU DALAM PERKARA PERCERAIAN DENGAN ALASAN PERTENGKARAN TERUS MENERUS DI PENGADILAN AGAMA DAN PENGADILAN NEGERI. Other thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (848Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    Fiqi Amalia Aldilla. 2016. E0012156. Comparison of the Implementation testiomium de auditu in divorce case with continous quarrel reason in religious court and district court.Legal Writing.Law faculty of Sebelas Maret University. This researchdescribesandexaminesthe problems. First, whythere is a differenceimplementationtestimoniumdeaudituin divorce caseby reason ofcontinuous quarrel inthe Religious Court and District Court. Second, howthe legal effect ofthe differences inthe application oftestimoniumdeaudituin their divorce caseby reason ofcontinuousquarrelinthe District CourtandReligious Court. This researchis anormativelegalresearch which is prescriptive. In nature the data used in this research is secondary dataincluiding primary legal materials. The data collection techniqueusedisthe study of literatureordocumentation. Technical analysis is thedeductive method.The results showed that the Religious Court judge accepted the testimonium de auditu. Testimonials de auditu not be used as evidence directly but constructed as a tool presupposition evidence, the objective and rational considerations, (jurisprudence of the Supreme Court Decision No. 308K/Pdt/1959 dated 11 November 1959). The judge in the District Court did not construct the testimonium de auditu as suspicions (jurisprudence of the Supreme Court Decision No. 308 K/Pdt/1959 dated 11 November 1959). Witness de auditu testifying at the District Court comes from the story Plaintiff through telephone conversations, although the testimony is derived from the story of the Plaintiff through telephone conversations. He legal consequences to the differences in the application of testimonials de auditu in their divorce case by reason of quarrel constantly in the District Court and Religious Court for testimonials de auditu not provided for in a written rule, the Judges are given the freedom to assess the testimony of de auditu besides conjecture and evidence of witnesses is the evidence is free the judge is free to mengkonstrusikan testimonials de auditu as prejudice by objective and rational considerations. Keywords: Testimoniumdeauditu, Divorceby reason ofcontinuousquarrel, Religious Court, The District Court

    Item Type: Thesis (Other)
    Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
    Divisions: Fakultas Hukum
    Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum
    Depositing User: Afifah Nur Laili
    Date Deposited: 17 May 2016 22:13
    Last Modified: 17 May 2016 22:13
    URI: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/id/eprint/26158

    Actions (login required)

    View Item