Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) dan Think Talk Write (TTW) pada Materi Fungsi Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri Se-Kabupaten Boyolali Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016

FITRIYANA ULFA, NUR (2016) Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) dan Think Talk Write (TTW) pada Materi Fungsi Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri Se-Kabupaten Boyolali Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. Masters thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (627Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    The purpose of this study was to know: 1) which one of TAI, TTW, and direct learning models that resulted in better students’ mathematics learning achievement on function; 2) which one of the students with climbers, campers, and quitters AQ category who had better mathematics learning achievement on function; 3) for each AQ caegory, which one of TAI, TTW, and direct learning models that could make the students get better mathematics achievement; 4) for each learning model, which one of climber, campers, and quitters students category that resulted in better mathematics achievement. This was a quasi experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research consisted of all the students in eighth grade of Junior High Schools in Boyolali Regency during the academic year of 2015/ 2016. The sampling was conducted by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used to collect the data were the students’ mathematics test result and adversity quotient questionnaire. Before being used to collect the data, the test and questionnaire instruments were tried-out. Validity test was conducted by the validator. Questionnaire instrument reliability test was conducted by using Cronbach alpha formula while internal consistency test was conducted by using product moment correlation formula from Karl Pearson. Instrument reliability test was conducted by using KR-20 formula and discrimination power by using product moment correlation by Karl Pearson. Balance test was conducted by one-way ANAVA test. Prerequisite test consisted of normality test by using Lilliefors testing method and homogeneity test by using Barttlet method. Data analyzing technique used were two-ways ANAVA test with unbalanced cell. Based on the hypothesis test, it was concluded as follows. 1) The mathematics learning achievement of the students who were treated by TAI learning model was better than the mathematics learning achievement of the students who were treated by TTW and direct learning model on function, the mathematics learning achievement of the students who were treated by TTW learning model was better than the mathematics learning achievement of the students who were treated by direct learning model on function. 2) The mathematics learning achievement of the students with climbers category was better than the mathematics learning achievement of the students with campers or quitters category and the learning achievement of campers category students was better than the learning achievement of quitters category students on function. 3) The students with climbers category who were treated by TAI, TTW, and direct learning models had the same mathematics learning achievement; the mathematics achievement of the the students with campers category who were treated by TAI learning model was same the mathematics learning achievement of the students who were treated by TTW learning model and was better than the one of the students who were treated by direct learning model, while the mathematics learning achievement of the students who were treated by TTW learning model was better than the achievement of the students who were treated by direct learning model; the students with quitters category who were treated by TAI learning model had better mathematics learning achievement than the students with TTW and direct learning model, the students mathematics learning achievement with TTW learning model was same the students with direct learning model. 4) In TAI learning model, the mathematics learning achievement of the students with climbers category was better than the mathematics learning achievement of the students with campers and quitters category, the mathematics learning achievement of the students with campers category was same the students with quitters category; in TTW learning model, the mathematics learning achievement of the students with climbers category was same of the students with campers category and was better than the students with quitters category, the mathematics learning achievement of the students with campers category was better than the students with quitters category; in direct learning model, the mathematics learning achievement of the students with climbers category was better than the students with campers and quitters category, the mathematics learning achievement of the students with campers category was same the students with quitters category. Keywords : TAI, TTW, Direct Learning Model, Adversity Quotient, Mathematics Learning Achievement

    Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
    Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
    Divisions: Pasca Sarjana > Magister
    Pasca Sarjana > Magister > Pendidikan Matematika - S2
    Depositing User: fauzi ahmad
    Date Deposited: 11 Apr 2016 11:04
    Last Modified: 11 Apr 2016 11:04
    URI: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/id/eprint/24486

    Actions (login required)

    View Item