PENGGUNAAN SAKSI MAHKOTA BAGI TERDAKWA DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA DAN RELEVANSINYA TERHADAP ASAS PRADUGA TIDAK BERSALAH (PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE) (Studi Kasus Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Nomor: 102/Pid/2012/PT-Mdn)

ANGGASAKTI, TODDY (2016) PENGGUNAAN SAKSI MAHKOTA BAGI TERDAKWA DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA DAN RELEVANSINYA TERHADAP ASAS PRADUGA TIDAK BERSALAH (PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE) (Studi Kasus Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Nomor: 102/Pid/2012/PT-Mdn). Other thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (274Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    ABSTRACT Toddy Anggasakti, E 0010340. 2015. Analysis of legal consequence of innocence presumption implementation for defendant on the use of key witness in criminal procedure to prove a case of planned murder (A case study of High Court’s Verdict No. 102/Pid/2012/PT-Mdn). Legal Writing (minithesis).Sebelas Maret University of Surakarta. The research examined and answered several legal issues. First, is a criminal procedure of legal consequence in implementation of presumption of innocence for defendant in line with provisions of Criminal Code? Second, is the use of key witness in a proving process of a planned murder case in contrast with implementation of presumption of innocence for defendant? The research is an applied, descriptive and normative one. Data source of the legal writing is primary and secondary legal materials. Data was collected by using literature method. The legal materials were analyzed by deductive-syllogism method. Based on results of the research, it can be concluded that criminal procedure on legal consequence of implementation of presumption of innocence for defendant was in line with stipulations of Act no. 8 of 1981 on Criminal Procedure, and Act no. 48 Article 8 paragraph (1) of 2009 on Judicial Power. The use of key witness in the proving process of a planned murder case is in contradiction to presumption of innocence for the defendant. In jurisprudence No. 1986 K/Pid/1989 of 21 March 1990 explained that Supreme Court is not forbidding the use of key witness by prosecutor in a trial with condition that the witness in his/her position as a defendant is not included in one bundle of case with the defendant to whom he/she makes testimony. In determining the criminal case of planned murder, High Court of Medan had considered testimonies of witness and other tools of proving. Key words: Legal consequence, presumption of innocence, key witness

    Item Type: Thesis (Other)
    Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
    Divisions: Fakultas Hukum
    Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum
    Depositing User: fransiska siska meilani
    Date Deposited: 26 Jan 2016 14:28
    Last Modified: 26 Jan 2016 14:28
    URI: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/id/eprint/23112

    Actions (login required)

    View Item