KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN KETERANGAN AHLI DIBACAKAN DALAM PERSIDANGAN PERKARAMELANGGAR KESUSILAAN MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sleman Nomor 476/PID.Sus/273/PN.Slmn)

Darmawan, Gilang Eky (2015) KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN KETERANGAN AHLI DIBACAKAN DALAM PERSIDANGAN PERKARAMELANGGAR KESUSILAAN MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sleman Nomor 476/PID.Sus/273/PN.Slmn). Other thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret .

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (153Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    GILANG EKY DARMAWAN, E0007139. 2015. STRENGTH OF EXPERT EVIDENCE FACTS READ IN VIOLATED ETHICS CRIME TRIAL BY LAW NUMBER 11 OF 2008 ON INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS (Study of Sleman District Court Decision No. 476 / PID.Sus / 273 / PN.Slmn). Faculty of Law, University of March. Writing this law aims to determine the strength of evidence of evidence expert testimony that was read in court on Decision No. 476 / PID.Sus / 2013 / PN.Slmn. In addition, it aims to describe legal writing about the validity of the expert testimony that was read by the Criminal Procedure Code as well as the extent to which expert testimony that was read Judge considered in deciding a case. This study prescriptive and applied, in legal research, the writer uses normative law research. As a source in the preparation of writing, the author uses primary legal materials and secondary law with the law of the material collection techniques through the study of literature. The analysis technique used in this research is the logical deduction that is by filing syllogism the major premise then the minor premise after it had drawn the conclusion of the second premise. Under the Criminal Code, expert testimony is one of the valid evidence. On offense against decency by Act No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions, used evidence expert testimony that an information and technology necessary to put forward as the least competent legal authorities in this field. The validity of expert testimony that was read is still valid if preceded by a call officially by the investigators and the experts first before giving a sworn statement that the information either verbally or written information or the form of letters, has been provided for in Article 120 in conjunction with Article 186 in conjunction with Article 187 paragraph (1) letter c of the Criminal Procedure Code. Expert testimony read by the judge considered in deciding the case because according to witnesses, testimony from the accused and the evidence, that the defendant declared legally and convincingly guilty of committing the offenses charged and sentenced to eight months probation 1 year in accordance with Article 183 in conjunction with Article 193 paragraph (1) Code of Criminal Procedure. Keywords: Strength of Evidence, Specification Expert, Presented

    Item Type: Thesis (Other)
    Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
    Divisions: Fakultas Hukum
    Depositing User: Afifah Nur Laili
    Date Deposited: 25 Nov 2015 05:28
    Last Modified: 25 Nov 2015 05:28
    URI: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/id/eprint/21955

    Actions (login required)

    View Item