TINJAUAN UPAYA PENUNTUT UMUM MEMBUKTIKAN DAKWAAN PERKARA KEKERASAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK DENGAN MENGHADIRKAN AHLI KANDUNGAN DIPERSIDANGAN (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SALATIGA NOMOR: 02/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Sal.)

PERMATA, ARUNI AMALIA (2015) TINJAUAN UPAYA PENUNTUT UMUM MEMBUKTIKAN DAKWAAN PERKARA KEKERASAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK DENGAN MENGHADIRKAN AHLI KANDUNGAN DIPERSIDANGAN (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SALATIGA NOMOR: 02/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Sal.). Other thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (565Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    Aruni Amalia Permatasari. E0011043. OVERVIEW ON PUBLIC PROCECUTOR EFFORT IN PROVING INDICTMENT OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN BY PRESENTING A GYNECOLOGIST IN THE COURT. (CASE STUDY ON SALATIGA DISTRICT COURT’VIRDICT NO. 02/Pid.Sus/2014/pn.Sal.). Thesis Faculry of Law Sebelas Maret University Surakarta. This legal research aims to determine whether the effort of general prosecutor in proving indictment of sexual violence against children by presenting a gynecologist in the court is in conformity with the provision of the Criminal Procedure Code and to determine whether explanation of gynecologist in proceeding of sexual violence against children in District Court is already in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code in Salatiga District Court’s Verdict Number: 02/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Sal. The type of this research is perspective normative law and applied. In this research the author use a case approach. Source of type and legal material in this research are consist of primary and secondary legal materials. Technique collection of legal materials in this research is the literature and document studies. Deductive Syllogism technique is applied in this analysis. The efforts of public prosecutor in proving indictment of sexual violence against children by presenting a gynecologist is already in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. It is evident that the argumentation should be referenced to the law (Criminal Code). In an effort of public prosecutor in Verdict Number : 02 / Pid.Sus / 2014 / PN.Sal. is appropriate because it is based on Article 184 paragraph (1) letter b. The terms of the formal and material in Article 143 paragraph (2) Criminal Procedure Code was already match between one and the other, so in this case there is no mistake (error in persona) that the case was brought to trial. Explanation of genocologist in investigation of sexual violence against children case in Salatiga Distric’s Court was considered by Judge, because of there is a conformity between genecologist’s explanantion and virdict that was decided by Judge in virdict number : 02/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Sal., which prove that the statement of expert has an important influence for the Judge to bring out his/her confidence in making the decision. In order to prove indictment and decision that is needed by defendant, the experts of other disciplines is required to be considered. Keywords: Public Prosecutor, Gynecologist, Sexual Violence.

    Item Type: Thesis (Other)
    Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
    Divisions: Fakultas Hukum
    Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum
    Depositing User: faizah sarah yasarah
    Date Deposited: 21 Nov 2015 09:52
    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2015 09:52
    URI: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/id/eprint/21817

    Actions (login required)

    View Item