ANALISIS PENJATUHAN PUTUSAN BEBAS (VRIJSPRAAK) TERHADAP TERDAKWA MARTHEN RENOUW DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG BIDANG KEHUTANAN OLEH HAKIM PENGADILAN NEGERI JAYAPURA

DIAN K, NOFIANA (2009) ANALISIS PENJATUHAN PUTUSAN BEBAS (VRIJSPRAAK) TERHADAP TERDAKWA MARTHEN RENOUW DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG BIDANG KEHUTANAN OLEH HAKIM PENGADILAN NEGERI JAYAPURA. Other thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

[img] PDF - Published Version
Download (1286Kb)

    Abstract

    NOFIANA DIAN K 2009. AN ANALYSIS OF GIVING FREE JUDGEMENT (VRIJSPRAAK) TO THE SENTENCED MARTHEN RENOUW ON THE MONEY LAUNDERING OF THE FOREST FIELD BY THE JUDGE OF THE STATE COURT OF JAYAPURA. Law Faculty of Sebelas Maret University of Surakarta. The study aims to reveal the basic consideration of the judge of the state court of Jayapura in giving free judgment (vrijspraak) to the sentenced Marthen Renouw on the money laundering of the forest field stated on the Decision Number: 04/PID.B/2006/PN.JPR pronounced by the judge of the Jayapura state court. It is normative study or descriptive doctrinal by using secondary data. In this study, the data collection technique used is document, which is the collection of secondary data relating to the problem studied. Then, the collected data are learned, are classified, and are analyzed as the objective and the problem of the study. It is a descriptive study, which is a study conducted to provide a detailed data by describing a certain phenomena. The type of secondary data is that the data is collected from the document, namely: the law regulation, files relating to the problem studied, such as the judgement and scientific articles and other written sources. The data are analyzed qualitatively, by collecting data ,qualifying them, then associating the theory relating to the problem and finally drawing conclusion to find the result. Of the result of the study, it can be concluded that in giving free judgement (vrijspraak) to the sentenced Marthen Renouw on the money laundering of the forest filed, the judge of the Jayapura state court has basic consideration that the indication of the action sentenced by the public prosecutor on the first as well as the second indictment has not been proved

    Item Type: Thesis (Other)
    Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
    Divisions: Fakultas Hukum
    Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum
    Depositing User: Vignasari Kokasih
    Date Deposited: 11 Jul 2013 23:49
    Last Modified: 11 Jul 2013 23:49
    URI: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/id/eprint/2109

    Actions (login required)

    View Item