TINJAUAN TENTANG PENJATUHAN PUTUSAN OLEH HAKIM YANG DIDASARKAN KEPADA ALAT BUKTI KETERANGAN SAKSI-SAKSI YANG DIBACAKAN PENUNTUT UMUM DI PERSIDANGAN PERKARA PENCURIAN (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bengkulu Nomor 255/Pid.B/2010/PN.BKL)

IRFANDI, REZA (2014) TINJAUAN TENTANG PENJATUHAN PUTUSAN OLEH HAKIM YANG DIDASARKAN KEPADA ALAT BUKTI KETERANGAN SAKSI-SAKSI YANG DIBACAKAN PENUNTUT UMUM DI PERSIDANGAN PERKARA PENCURIAN (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bengkulu Nomor 255/Pid.B/2010/PN.BKL). Other thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (131Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    This study aims to determine how the imposition of a decision by the judge based on the witnesses’ statement were read by the prosecution in the trial of theft cases in a case study of Bengkulu District Court Decision No. 255/Pid.B/2010/PN.BKL. The next study was to determine how the suitability of witnesses’ statements reading by prosecution in the trial in accordance with the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code. As for the further study on the base of a considerations of court decision on evidentiary that complies with the Criminal Procedure Code to the theft case. This research was a kind of normative legal research or usually called doctrinal legal research. This research was prescriptive and applied research. This study used a case study approach. This study used a primary legal material that is legislation and the Judge’s decision and the secondary law of textbooks written by legal experts and law journal that related to this law writing. This study used the law materials collection technique of library research. This study used analytical techniques to the legal materials with syllogism deduction method. Based on the research results and discussion were resulted conclusions. The readings of witnesses’ statement by prosecution in the trial of Bengkulu District Court in the theft case No. 255/Pid.B/2010/PN.BKL not in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. Because under the provisions of Article 185 paragraph (1) of Criminal Procedure Code stated that the witness’ statement as evidence is what the witness has stated in court, and in this case the witnesses were not present in court and his statement was read out, the value of evidence is not perfect. While the base of the decision of the Bengkulu District Court on the evidence of witnesses’ statements that was read is also not in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. Keywords: Evidence, Witness’ Statement, Theft

    Item Type: Thesis (Other)
    Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
    Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum
    Depositing User: Minardi Aris
    Date Deposited: 27 Sep 2015 14:03
    Last Modified: 27 Sep 2015 14:03
    URI: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/id/eprint/19607

    Actions (login required)

    View Item