TINJAUAN KETIDAKCERMATAN HAKIM PENGADILAN NEGERI KENDARI DALAM MENILAI ALAT BUKTI KETERANGAN SAKSI SEBAGAI DASAR KASASI PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM PERKARA NARKOTIKA (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR : 1421K/PID.SUS/2013

PUTRA, RANDY MAHENDRA (2015) TINJAUAN KETIDAKCERMATAN HAKIM PENGADILAN NEGERI KENDARI DALAM MENILAI ALAT BUKTI KETERANGAN SAKSI SEBAGAI DASAR KASASI PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM PERKARA NARKOTIKA (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR : 1421K/PID.SUS/2013. Other thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (616Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    This research reviews and answers the problem about innacuracy of the judge of Karanganyar District Court in evaluatingthe evidence of witness’s explanation as a basic of the cassation by prosecutor in Narcotic case as regulated on Article 253 point (1) and reviews law implementation by the judge of Kendari Disctrict Court regarding drug abuse. This research classified as normative research which type is prescriptive. Data used in this research are primary and secondary data. Secondary data is the main data in this research, while primary data is applied as secondary data. Secondary data is gathered by literature review or document review. Analytical technique that is used here is qualitative. The basic character of this analysis is deductive , that is to draw a conclusion from general points into more specified points. The conclusion resulted from this research is innacuracy of the Judge of Kendari District Court in evaluating the evidence of witness’s explanation as a basic of the cassation by prosecutor in Narcotic case is suitable with KUHAP in Article 253 point (1), that the decision of the high court of southeast Sulawesi which reinforce the decision of Kendari District Court , has been mistaken in applying the law, because the consideration that is used by the judge is not suitable with the claim proposed by the prosecutor , which in the claim prosecutorproposes Article 112 point (1) Law Number 35 year 2009 , but the judge uses Article 127 point (1) Law Number 25 year 2011 as the consideration instead, therefeore there’s a clear discrepancy between the judge and prosecutor Keyword : Narkotic, Cassation, Judex Factie

    Item Type: Thesis (Other)
    Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
    Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum
    Depositing User: Minardi Aris
    Date Deposited: 17 Sep 2015 16:51
    Last Modified: 17 Sep 2015 16:51
    URI: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/id/eprint/19192

    Actions (login required)

    View Item