TINJAUAN YURIDIS NILAI PEMBUKTIAN KETERANGAN AHLI YANG DIBACAKAN DALAM PEMERIKSAAN PERKARA PORNOGRAFI ( STUDI KASUS DALAM PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI BOYOLALI NOMOR 279/Pid.Sus/2012/PN.Bi )

Swandana, Septian Danang (2015) TINJAUAN YURIDIS NILAI PEMBUKTIAN KETERANGAN AHLI YANG DIBACAKAN DALAM PEMERIKSAAN PERKARA PORNOGRAFI ( STUDI KASUS DALAM PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI BOYOLALI NOMOR 279/Pid.Sus/2012/PN.Bi ). Other thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (584Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    This study was entitled A Juridical Review on the Authentication Value of Expert Information read in pornography case investigation (A Case Study on Boyolali District Court’s Verdict Number 279/Pid.Sus/2012/PN.Bi). This study was a normative law research that was prescriptive in nature using law material sources, both primary and secondary. Technique of collecting law material in this research was library study through collecting legislations, books, and other supporting documents, such as Boyolali District Court’s Verdict Number 279/Pid.Sus/2012/PN.Bi. In this study, the author conducted an analysis using syllogism method departing from proposing major premise, i.e. Code of Criminal Procedure and Minor Premise i.e. Boyolali District Court’s Verdict Number 279/Pid.Sus/2012/PN.Bi, from both of which a reasoning was drawn concerning the authentication value of expert information read in pornography case trial. Considering the result of research conducted by the writer, it could be found that the expert information read by the public prosecutor did not have perfect authentication value and was not conclusive at all, did not bind the Judge. The judge assessed the strength or the truth of information independently, and could accept or override it. The document of expert information read by the Public Prosecutor was not used absolutely, because some information should be actually based on witness information, defendant information, document and other supporting evidence. Expert information was merely supplemental evidence asked for by the Judge. Keywords: Evidence, Expert Information, Document Evidence.

    Item Type: Thesis (Other)
    Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
    Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum
    Depositing User: Minardi Aris
    Date Deposited: 16 Sep 2015 23:49
    Last Modified: 16 Sep 2015 23:49
    URI: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/id/eprint/19161

    Actions (login required)

    View Item