TELAAH KRITIS SISTEM PEMBUKTIAN MENURUT UNDANGUNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1981 TENTANG KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 25 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG

SUPRIYANTO, BAMBANG EDHY (2008) TELAAH KRITIS SISTEM PEMBUKTIAN MENURUT UNDANGUNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1981 TENTANG KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 25 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG. Masters thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

[img] PDF - Published Version
Download (400Kb)

    Abstract

    Bambang Edhy Supriyanto S. 310906215, 2008.The Critical Analysis to The Evidence System According of The Penal Procedural Act Number 8, 1981 and The Law Of Money Laundering Number 25, 2003. Thesis : Postgraduate Program Sebelas Maret University of Surakarta. Thesis : Postgraduate Program Sebelas Maret University of Surakarta. The purposes of this research are to make critical process of the money laundering evidence policy based on the Law Formulation Theory, and knowing consequence and proving implication with two evidence system, knowing a weakness and the money loundry evidence system excess. This thesis research type is doctrinal or normative research based on the second concept of the law from Soetandyo Wignyosoebroto. The research character is diagnostic. The data analysis applies qualitative analysis with using the logic principle, systematic, and juridict. Based on the description of the research result and related to the case studied, it can be concluded (a) The formulation of the money laundering evidence policy on the law of Money Laundering is to fill formulation of the law formation, but in input have an obstruction is no feeback is out comes acheaved who will be result , because the law of money laundry is too dominated by politic component as the main component, and not too pay attention for economic component in this thing is a disadvantages of country as the effect of money laundry. In the rule formulation must to pay attention philosophy aspect, sosiologic and juridict so in the performing level can be create of the law purpose. (b) the consequence and implication from there be equation and distinctive of the arrangement evidenced between The Penal Procedural Act and the law of money laundry at the rule in section 184 of The Penal Procedural Act. There is even in contrast is that in the Penal Procedural Act is unsystematized probe system flips over and electronic prove tool that constitutes a proof tool extension in the Penal Procedural Act.(c) In term of evidence the money laundry have a weakness as be equalled electronic proof tool force equalised with directions evidence tool so get easily be ruled out by other prove tool corresponds at the rule in section 184 of The Penal Procedural Act. Meanwhile in reverse probe to be gotten weakness because marks sense retroaktif's ground, at the law principle is may not retroactive, its reducing is electronic proof tool arrangement, jurisdictional enforcer is not understand the way of konfrehensif about the evidence, and also bended on the evidence with bureaucracy system and fictitious mail about asset wealth who one will validate and may used as mail evidence tool.

    Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
    Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
    Divisions: Pasca Sarjana > Magister > Ilmu Hukum - S2
    Depositing User: Users 837 not found.
    Date Deposited: 21 Aug 2013 23:10
    Last Modified: 21 Aug 2013 23:10
    URI: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/id/eprint/10307

    Actions (login required)

    View Item