IMPLEMENTASI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 9 TAHUN 1998 TENTANG KEMERDEKAAN MENYAMPAIKAN PENDAPAT DI MUKA UMUM DI WILAYAH SRAGEN

HANDAYANI, SRI (2008) IMPLEMENTASI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 9 TAHUN 1998 TENTANG KEMERDEKAAN MENYAMPAIKAN PENDAPAT DI MUKA UMUM DI WILAYAH SRAGEN. Masters thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

[img] PDF - Published Version
Download (446Kb)

    Abstract

    Sri Handayani, S. 310207017, 2008. Implementation of Laws number 9 Year 1998 About Freedom to Suggest The Opinion in Front of General in Region of Sragen. Thesis. Graduate Program in Law. Sebelas Maret University. This research aim to know an analyses implementation of Law Number 9 Year 1998 in Sragen region and studies factors cause of haves could not implemented of Laws number 9 year 1998. Research type in this writing is sociologist, by 5th law concept. Form of research applied is diagnostic - evaluative. The data analysis has been using qualitative analysis. Based on description result of research and solution related to the problem is studied with law theory to work, inferential that factors causing the happening of taste short exchange for example as follows : (1) from legal substance aspect, that is existence of legislation rule that is in normatif is against Law the other, for example rule Article 10 obliging passion bearer to inform activity to Police and gets permit in the form of STTP ( Receipt Letter is Notification ) and the notification at least during 3 x 24 hours before the activity is done. This thing is assumed is against rule of UUD 1945 and Human Right. And so do rule Article 11 obliging taste bearer to mention number of participants, time and the duration, route and teaching aid applied, this thing is in difficult field is implementation by side number of participants which cannot be predicted, teaching aid and route of the participants from and towards location cannot be predicted in precise. (2) from legal structure aspect for example that government officer Kepolisian based on Decree Kapolri Nomor Pol. : Skep/1600/X/1998 laxative agent Law No. 9 year 1998 acurately and correctness. As for becoming constraint in its(the execution for example informing is submitted through on faximile and less than 3 x 24 hours, submitted by man that is is not understood the activity, fictious address, STTP is not taken and execution of activity of unmatched to notice / STTP. ( 3) from legal culture aspect, in general action participant of taste short exchange has not comprehended about proffering procedure STTP, acts sceptic, existence of high solidarity taste, simply participation, which all the of triggered by situation of economics social, unemployement and difficult of employment. Its the consequences is logical, that is haves no implementation of rule of Law No. 9 Year 1998, hence worryed of will be able to generate action of anarchist, disobeys to applicable law rule. Side that is taste short exchange would still arise if problems root is not able yet to finalized carefully, and will be able to generate un-orderliness of public if public is not supplied understanding that is enough about meaning of democracy as fully. Suggested need to revise provisions in Law No. 9 Year 1998, especially about criminal sanction for they which is not fulfills order in Article 10, Article 11 and Article 12, and not just action of disbandment of action of short exchange felt as of eye.

    Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
    Subjects: K Law > KZ Law of Nations
    Divisions: Pasca Sarjana > Magister > Ilmu Hukum - S2
    Depositing User: Users 837 not found.
    Date Deposited: 21 Aug 2013 23:23
    Last Modified: 21 Aug 2013 23:23
    URI: https://eprints.uns.ac.id/id/eprint/10301

    Actions (login required)

    View Item