ADIWIJANA, I PUTU WISNA (2010) EKSISTENSI SENTRA PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERPADU DALAM PENANGANAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PEMILU LEGISLATIF TAHUN 2009 (Studi Kasus di Daerah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Sukoharjo). Other thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.
|PDF - Published Version |
This research has aim to find out the matter related with handling pattern of Legislative General Election criminal act case at the year of 2009, to find out the existence of Gakkumdu Centre in the handling of legislative election criminal act case at the year of 2009 in law area of Sukoharjo District Court and to find out the constraintobstruction faced by Gakkumdu Centre in the handling of Legislative General Election criminal act case at the year of 2009 in law area of Sukoharjo District Court. This research is done in law area of Sukoharjo District Court with empirical or sociological research. Data collection method used is field study and library study for deriving primary and secondary data. Data analysis in this research is qualitative data analysis with interactive analysis model. After doing analysis, it is derived conclusion that the handling pattern of Legislative Election criminal act case at the year of 2009 according to Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2008 has determined procedure of law established specifically in the settlement of legislative general election criminal act case by providing investigation time limit of investigation, pre-pursuit, pursuit that is shorter than KUHAP. The existence of Gakumdu Centre (Integrated Law Enforcement) in Sukoharjo Regency whose members consist of Panswaslu element, Indonesia Police of Sukoharjo Resort, and element from Sukoharjo District Attorney in handling of Legislative General Election criminal act case at the year of 2009 is not optimal yet, of eight criminal report submitted to Panwaslu, only two of them that can be processed but only one that is stated complete (P-21) that is behalf of defendant Syarif Hidayatullah and is handed over to the pursuit stage, even it is decided by Sukoharjo District Court for six month in jail and fine of Rp. 6.000.000,-(six million rupiah) but in the higher level court (banding) the defendant is sentenced to be free. While the other archive is behalf of Drs. Suwandi is stated uncompleted by Attorney with the reason that it is expired. Meanwhile, the obstructions faced by Gakkumdu Centre is : (1) there is interpretation difference toward the prevailing Law rule determination, (2) there is no clarity about the reporting time period (3) time tolerance of the handling of legislative general election criminal act is to limited so that the handling is done in a hurry.
|Item Type:||Thesis (Other)|
|Subjects:||K Law > K Law (General)|
Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum
|Depositing User:||Andika Setiawan|
|Date Deposited:||15 Jul 2013 09:58|
|Last Modified:||15 Jul 2013 09:58|
Actions (login required)