PUNDING, WALTER (2011) EFEKTIVITAS METODE PEMBELAJARAN PETA KONSEP DALAM MENINGKATKAN PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA KELAS XI IPA SMA NEGERI DI KOTA PALANGKA RAYA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2010 / 2011. Masters thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.
|PDF - Published Version |
The aim of this research is (1) to know better or not mathematics learning achievement among students which are taught by concept map method and conventional method. (2) to know better or not learning achievement of mathematics between students who have high creativity compared to medium creativity and low creativity. (3) to know better or not learning achievement of mathematics between students who are taught by concept map method compared students who are taught by using conventional method, on each students with high creativity, medium creativity and low creativity. Ressearch method used is quasi experiment research with using factorial design 2x3. This research was performed in July 2010 up to December 2010 with population students of SMA Negeri (State General High School) class XI IPA (Science Study) in Palangka Raya City. Sample taking technique used in this research is Stratified Cluster Random Sampling, while sample chosen are students of SMAN 1 Palangka Raya, SMAN 3 Palangka Raya and SMAN 4 Palangka Raya which each of them consist of 2 class, a class for experiment class, a class for control class. The number of students which are fixed as sample are amount 210 students, 105 students as experiment class and 105 students as controll class. Data collecting is performed by documentation method, quetionare, and test. Documentation of summative test semester 2 of class X IPA used to balance test, quetionare method used to collecting data of creativity students and test method used to collecting data of mathematics learning achievement. Before using these instruments, they are tried out previously in class XI IPA of SMA N 2 Palangka Raya. Instrument analysis test used is content validity test by experts judgement and reliability test used is KR test -20; while analysis of test items used is differentiability and difficulty level test. Instrument analysis used is content validity by experts judgement and questionare of reliability used is Cronbach Alpha; while analysis of questionare items used is internal consistency. From 40 items of test which are tried out, 30 items which are used, while from 40 questionare items which are tried out, 32 items of questionare which are used to collecting data in this research. Data analysis technique used in this research is two ways variant analysis (ANAVA) with not same cell continued by double comparassion test with method of Scheffe. Before data analysed by ANAVA test, prerequisite test is performed previously, they are normality test with Liliefors method and homogeneity test with using Bartlett test. perpustakaan.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id commit to user xx The result of data analysis used is two ways Anava with not same cell with significance level α = 0.05 are (1) There is different effect between the line ( Fa = 8.9769 > F0.05;1;204 = 3.8875), with other word there is different effectiveness between concept map teaching and conventional teaching method against mathematics learning achievement. (2) There is different effect between the column (Fb = 21.0879 > F0.05;2;204 = 3.0402), with another word there is different achievements of mathematics learning between high creativity, medium and low group, (3) There is no interaction between teaching method and student creativity level to mathematics learning achievement (Fab = 0.9693 > F0.05;2;204 = 3,0402). Conclusion from this research are: (1) mathematics learning achievement of the student who are taught by concept map teaching learning method is better than students who are taught by conventional teaching method, (2) mathematics learning achievement of the student whose high creativity is better than mathematics learning achievement of student whose medium creativity, and low creativity. Mathematics learning achievement of the students whose medium creativity is better than mathematics learning achievement whose low creativity, (3a) on the students whose high creativity, mathematics learning achievement which is taught by concept map method is better than which is taught by conventional method, (3b) on the students with medium creativity, mathematics learning achievement which is taught by concept map method is better than which is taught by method, (3c) on the student with low creativity, mathematics learning achievement which is taught by concept map method is better than which is taught by conventional method. Key Words: Concept Map Method, Mathematics Learning Achievement, Student Creativity.
|Item Type:||Thesis (Masters)|
|Subjects:||L Education > L Education (General)|
|Divisions:||Pasca Sarjana > Magister > Pendidikan Matematika - S2|
|Depositing User:||Lia Primadani|
|Date Deposited:||19 Aug 2013 15:17|
|Last Modified:||19 Aug 2013 15:17|
Actions (login required)